Montana vs New Hampshire Budget FY2026
Spending, revenue and category allocations compared side by side.
Key Budget Metrics โ Montana vs New Hampshire
Montana
$16.6 billion
New Hampshire
$15.9 billion
Montana
โ
New Hampshire
$3.9 billion
Montana
โ
New Hampshire
โ
Montana
โ
New Hampshire
โ
Montana
$310 million
New Hampshire
$230 million
Montana
โ
New Hampshire
โ
Receipts & Expenditure Comparison
| Particulars | Montana | New Hampshire | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Expenditure (all funds) | $16.6 billion | $15.9 billion | +4.5% |
| General Fund Expenditure | โ | $3.9 billion | โ |
| Total Revenue | โ | โ | โ |
| General Fund Revenue | โ | โ | โ |
| Rainy Day Fund | $310 million | $230 million | +34.8% |
| State GDP | โ | โ | โ |
Montana per resident
$14,498
New Hampshire per resident
$11,230
Montana โ Spending Composition
Data not available
New Hampshire โ Spending Composition
Data not available
Compare Another Fiscal Year
Understanding This Comparison
State budgets are compared on an all-funds basis โ the total across the general fund, federal grants, and dedicated state funds. This is the fairer measure, because states differ widely in how much they route outside the general fund. The general fund row shows the discretionary portion that state legislatures actually debate.
Fiscal years differ between states: most run July to June, Alabama and Michigan run October to September, and New York runs April to March. Figures labelled with the same fiscal year therefore cover slightly different periods.
Definitions for every term used here are in the US budget glossary. To compare across countries, see India budget comparisons.
Explore more budget data
Browse all 50 state budgets, the federal budget across every fiscal year, or build a different comparison from the compare page.